The 7 reasons why nuclear energy is not the answer to solve climate change Analysis New nuclear power costs about 5 times more than onshore wind power per kWh. Nuclear takes 5 to 17 years longer between planning and operation and produces on average 23 times the emissions per unit electricity generated. In addition, it creates risk and cost associated with weapons proliferation, meltdown, mining lung cancer, and waste risks. Clean, renewables avoid all such risks. By Mark Z. Jacobson
Russian nuclear power for the whole world – except Russia? Background In Russia, atomic energy is completely state-owned and paid for out of taxpayers’ money. The state corporation “Rosatom” comprises civilian and military nuclear technology companies. It is the world’s largest producer of nuclear power plants (NPPs) and its activities extend more to projects in other countries than in Russia itself. Thanks to large capacities for uranium enrichment, which remained in Russian hands after the collapse of the Soviet Union, Rosatom currently controls 17% of world production of nuclear fuels. By Vladimir Slivyak
Mycle Schneider: "Every euro invested in nuclear power makes the climate crisis worse" Interview Can nuclear energy help us meet climate goals? Mycle Schneider, editor of the annual World Nuclear Industry Status Report (WNISR), which assesses the status and trends of the global nuclear power industry, says no. Interview courtesy of DW. By Gero Rueter
Nuclear Power in the European Union Analysis The issue of nuclear power has been with the European Union since the very beginning of the nuclear age. Where are operating nuclear power plants in the world? Who is building new reactors? What happened in the European region after Chernobyl and the fall of the Berlin Wall? By Mycle Schneider
The Czech Nuclear Republic Commentary While many European countries are phasing out nuclear energy, either for political or economic reasons, Czechia is hoping to go in the opposite direction. Nuclear reactors are proclaimed – and also perceived by much of society – to be a clean and safe source of energy. How did this come about? By Edvard Sequens and Žaneta Gregorová
Ukraine’s nuclear impasse Analysis What is the problem within the construction of units 3 and 4 of Khmelnytskyi Nuclear Power Plant in Ukraine? To understand the situation around this it is necessary to have clear picture of Ukrainian nuclear sector in general. By Oleksandra Zaika
Nuclear weather in France: no clouds in sight Commentary Thirty-five years ago, a few days after the Chernobyl disaster, authorities throughout Europe alerted the population to the radioactive cloud. All of them? No. In France, where more than thirty nuclear reactors were already in operation, the authorities waited several weeks before acknowledging that the cloud had passed over the country. By Jules Hebert
Hungary’s Paks 2 nuclear plant project: Russia’s controversial test laboratory Commentary The Chernobyl disaster is the origin and the starting point for many green and anti-nuclear activists of my generation in Hungary. What are the dilemmas and how does the public see nuclear energy in Hungary on the 35th anniversary of Chernobyl and the 10th of the Fukushima disaster? By Benedek Jávor
The new nuclear power plant in Belarus and reminders of Chernobyl Analysis For the first 29 years of the country’s independence, nuclear power was not used in Belarus. It was not until 7 November 2020, the anniversary of the October Revolution, that the first nuclear power plant was inaugurated in Ostrovets, close to the border with Lithuania. By Hanna Valynets
Fukushima: The Nuclear Crisis Is Ongoing, Yet It’s Not Hopeless Commentary In former evacuation zones of the Fukushima nuclear disaster, although the government of Japan pronounced it safe to resume normal life, some returnees found such a life elusive. To make life possible on their once-abandoned land, they decided to tackle radiation in their own ways. By Dr. Tam Man-kei